Published on:

By

Lenovo class action lawsuits have targeted several different problems in Lenovo laptops and consumer products, including defective displays, broken hinges, battery drain, USB and microphone failures, website privacy claims, and preinstalled software. Some of these cases have already settled. Others are still pending or in the investigation stage.

As of June 2026, the older Lenovo Flex 5 and Yoga 730 display defect settlement are closed. The newer Lenovo class action activity involves a pending website privacy case and active investigations into laptop hardware defects, especially hinge cracking in the Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Type 81YK. We talk about all of these cases and what your options are.

Current Lenovo Class Action Lawsuits and Investigations

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

A cerebral palsy birth injury lawsuit is a medical malpractice claim filed by a family who believes a doctor, nurse, midwife, hospital, or newborn care team made a mistake that caused a baby to suffer a preventable brain injury. These cases usually involve hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), fetal distress, delayed C-section, neonatal seizures, low cord gases, abnormal MRI findings, and a later diagnosis of cerebral palsy.

The hard truth is that not every case of cerebral palsy is a lawsuit. Many children with cerebral palsy did not suffer malpractice. Cerebral palsy can come from abnormal brain development, prematurity, infection, stroke, genetics, placental disease, or events that happened before labor. But cerebral palsy far too often also results from preventable oxygen deprivation during labor, delayed delivery, poor fetal monitoring, mismanaged Pitocin, untreated newborn seizures, or a newborn emergency that should have been handled faster. These preventable mistakes are a runway that often leads to cerebral palsy.

The best cerebral palsy birth injury cases are built from the records. The fetal monitor strip is often the closest thing to a black box in the delivery room. It can show whether the baby was doing well, when the baby began to struggle, how long the distress continued, and whether the delivery team responded quickly enough. The cord gases, Apgar scores, resuscitation notes, cooling records, NICU chart, MRI, EEG, placental pathology, and pediatric neurology records help answer the rest.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By
Unclaimed class action settlement money is money that was set aside for class members but never paid out because people missed the notice, moved, ignored the claim form, missed the deadline, or never cashed the settlement check.

If you have ever bought a product, signed up for a service, paid hidden fees, received a data breach notice, used a subscription service, or dealt with a company accused of misleading consumers, there is a chance you were included in a class action settlement. The problem is that many people never claim the money available to them.

Some class action settlements require receipts, account records, loss documents, or proof of purchase. Others are no-proof class action settlements. That means eligible class members may be able to file a claim by certifying that they bought the product, used the service, received the notice, or otherwise fit the settlement criteria.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By
If you have ever bought a product, signed up for a service, had your data exposed in a breach, or dealt with a company that may not have been fully transparent, there is a real chance you qualify for a class action settlement.

Many of the settlements listed here do not require receipts or detailed documentation for at least part of the claim. These are commonly referred to as no-proof class action settlements. That does not mean anyone can file. It means eligible class members may submit a claim by certifying that they purchased the product, used the service, received a breach notice, or otherwise meet the settlement criteria.

This page focuses on current and upcoming class action settlements open to consumers in 2026. Most involve issues such as misleading advertising, data breaches, recurring subscription fees, violations of receipt privacy, price-fixing, or unauthorized use of consumer information. Some allow a basic claim without proof. Others allow a small payment without documentation but require receipts, account records, or other documents if you want a larger reimbursement.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

A birth injury lawsuit is filed when a family believes a doctor, nurse, midwife, hospital, or newborn care team made a medical mistake that caused a preventable injury to a baby. These cases often involve cerebral palsy, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, neonatal seizures, brain damage, Erb’s palsy, brachial plexus injury, developmental delay, or another permanent disability.

If you are reading this page, you probably are not looking for a medical textbook. You are trying to understand what happened to your child. You may remember the monitor alarms, the nurse coming in and out, the doctor being called, the delay before the C-section, the baby not crying, the NICU transfer, the seizures, or the first time someone said “brain injury” or “cerebral palsy.” Families come to us because they want answers, and because those answers matter for the rest of their child’s life.

Hospitals and doctors fight these cases hard. The defense will argue the injury happened before labor, came from genetics, prematurity, infection, placental problems, maternal conditions, or an unavoidable emergency. Of course, sometimes that is true. But sometimes, far too often, the fetal monitor was screaming for help, the C-section was delayed, Pitocin was mismanaged, shoulder dystocia was handled poorly, or a newborn emergency was not treated fast enough.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

Internal bra mesh lawsuits are being filed by women who say surgical mesh used in breast augmentation, breast lift, breast reduction, revision, or post-mastectomy reconstruction caused serious injuries instead of support. Our lawyers are handling these claims.

These cases involve products such as GalaFLEX, GalaFLEX Lite, GalaFLEX 3D, GalaFLEX 3DR, Phasix Mesh, Phasix ST Mesh, and other synthetic or biologic mesh products used to reinforce breast tissue or support implants. The core claims are that the mesh caused infection, chronic pain, nerve damage, seroma, inflammation, capsular contracture, mesh exposure, implant malposition, reconstruction failure, disfigurement, revision surgery, or removal surgery.

An internal bra is a surgical technique. The mesh is placed inside the breast to provide support beneath the tissue or implant. When it works, the goal is lift, support, and stability. When it fails, the patient can be left with pain, infection, hardening, scarring, deformity, implant loss, or a surgery that has to be redone.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being filed by patients who say their implanted pain device caused new injuries instead of relief. Our lawyers are handling these claims.

These cases involve devices made by Boston Scientific, Abbott, Medtronic, Nevro, and other neuromodulation companies. The core claims are that the device migrated, malfunctioned, shocked the patient, burned, failed to control pain, caused neurological problems, required revision surgery, or had to be removed entirely.

A spinal cord stimulator is a surgically implanted device near the spinal cord. The leads sit in the epidural space, and the implanted pulse generator sends electrical stimulation intended to interfere with pain signals. When the device works, it helps patients with chronic pain. When it fails, the patient is often left with worse pain, additional surgery, nerve injury, infection, paralysis, or permanent limitations that did not exist before the implant.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

From the early 1950s to the late 1980s, the Marine Corps base at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina provided residents and employees with drinking water heavily contaminated with toxic chemicals.

Extensive scientific research has revealed that the poisoned water supply at Camp Lejeune had a devastating impact on the long-term health of base residents, who have suffered significantly higher rates of birth defects, cancer, and neurological conditions.

Our lawyers are not taking new clients in this litigation. This page provides the latest updates on the Camp Lejeune litigation and addresses some of your key questions as this litigation drags on.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

Grok sexual deepfake lawsuits are being filed against xAI over claims that Grok and related image-generation tools were used to create and spread nonconsensual sexual images of real people. The lawsuits focus on a simple question with serious consequences: Did XAI release and promote a tool that could turn ordinary photos of women, girls, and other real people into sexualized deepfakes without meaningful safeguards?

These are not ordinary internet defamation cases. A sexual deepfake can look real, spread fast, attach itself to a victim’s name, and keep resurfacing after the original post is removed. Survivors describe fear, humiliation, anxiety, depression, loss of privacy, reputational harm, school disruption, work disruption, and the awful feeling that strangers may have saved, shared, or traded fake intimate images of them.

The strongest Grok deepfake cases will be built on proof: the prompt history, the source photo, the generated image or link, the account that posted it, takedown requests, platform responses, police reports, school reports, therapy records, witness statements, and evidence that xAI knew this kind of misuse was foreseeable before more people were harmed.

Continue Reading
Published on:

By

Roundup lawsuit have been going on for over eight years now. This is the story of the Roundup litigation, what plaintiffs can do in 2025, and an update on the latest spate of Roundup NHL verdicts nationwide.

Lawsuits regarding the Roundup weed killer allege that Monsanto’s herbicide led to the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma or similar cancers in individuals. Plaintiffs claim that Monsanto and its parent company, Bayer, failed to disclose the potential cancer risks associated with the product to the public. Moreover, these legal actions assert that the company deliberately misled the public about Roundup’s safety.

Referred to in litigation as the “Monsanto Papers,” internal communications from Monsanto revealed potential concealment of Roundup’s cancer connection over an extended period. These documents purportedly displayed evidence of the company’s amicable relationships with regulators and tactics employed to suppress scientific evidence linking glyphosate to cancer.

Continue Reading