Published on:

Talcum powder products like baby powder were once used on a daily basis by millions of people in the U.S. It was recently discovered, however, that many talc products contained small amounts of asbestos which made them cancerous. Thousands of people who developed ovarian cancer or mesothelioma after extended use of talcum powder products are now suing the manufacturer, Johnson & Johnson, alleging that it knew about the dangers of talc and failed to warn them.

On this page we will look at the talcum powder cancer lawsuits and their potential settlement value.  If you have a potential talcum powder claim, call our talc cancer lawyers today.


UPDATES:

Published on:

Millions of women use chemical hair relaxers on a regular basis. In 2022, new scientific research revealed that chronic exposure to the chemicals in hair relaxer products can cause uterine and ovarian cancer. This new evidence prompted a wave of lawsuits against the manufacturers of hair relaxer products by women claiming that they developed cancer as a result of using these products.

Our mass tort lawyers have been at the forefront of the hair relaxer cancer lawsuits from the very beginning. We are currently accepting hair relaxer cancer cases from women across the country.

News & Updates:

Published on:

Within the past year, many lawsuits have been filed against Teva Pharmaceuticals. These Paragard IUD lawsuits allege that suits allege that Teva’s IUD fractures upon removal, resulting in fragments being left in the uterus. The plaintiffs claimed this caused them to undergo additional removal procedures, which would have been unnecessary had this defect not occurred.  The purpose of this page is to provide a status update on the current state of the Paragard lawsuits as of 2025.

Indeed, the biggest news in the short history of this litigation was last month when these lawsuits were centralized into an MDL in Georgia federal court.  This means there will be a class action in which all federal court cases will be consolidated in Georgia under one judge.  So if you have a federal case in California, Texas, Florida, or anywhere, it will end up.

Let’s start out by talking about some of the science behind these cases.  Usually, what fuels litigation is that studies come out, and lawyers jump on these studies to bring lawsuits.  In this litigation, it might be a little bit backward.  It took a while for plaintiffs’ lawyers to pick up on the problems with Paragard.  Now a new study further supports the contention Paragard lawyers are making.

Published on:

Victims of sexual abuse or sexual assault have the right to file civil lawsuits and get financial compensation. Recent changes in the law are now making it easier for abuse victims to seek justice in the civil courts. This post will discuss how sex abuse victims can file civil lawsuits in California and look at the potential settlement value of these cases.

What Does Sex Abuse Mean Legally in California? 

This may seem like a strange and somewhat obvious question, but the legal definition of “sex abuse” for purposes of filing a lawsuit may actually be very different from what most people think. Anyone considering a sex abuse lawsuit needs to have a clear understanding of just what is considered “sexual abuse” and/or sexual assault under California law.

Published on:

Fortnite is one of the most popular video games on the planet these days, but it’s also one of the most addictive and a growing number of children and their parents are seeking to hold the game developer liable.

Both he medical community and the general public are now starting to acknowledge the serious harms associated with video game addiction, also known as gaming disorder. A growing number of gamers and their parents are now filing lawsuits against Fortnite’s developer, Epic Games, alleging harm caused by the game’s addictive nature.

This page will examine the issue of gaming addiction and the unique qualities that make Fortnite particularly addictive. We will also review the claims being raised in Fortnite addiction lawsuits and explore the potential settlement value of these cases.

Published on:

For the last 4 years, a number of lawsuits have been filed against Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (“J&J”) involving its OGX line of shampoo and hair care products. These lawsuits are based on the fact that testing found that OGX products contained the chemicals formaldehyde and DMDD, which are not only toxic but also cause hair loss.

On this page we will look at the OGX shampoo lawsuits. We will explain the basic allegations being made in these cases, the current status of the litigation, and our predictions on the eventual outcome.

About OGX Hair Care Products

Published on:

In a significant legal development, Walgreens has agreed to a $100 million settlement to address allegations of overcharging insured customers for generic medications. The lawsuit contended that Walgreens did not factor in its Prescription Savings Club (PSC) prices when determining the “usual and customary” rates reported to insurers. This omission allegedly led to inflated costs for both consumers and third-party payors.

This Walgreens class action lawsuit settlement has been a long time in coming.  This lawsuit was filed eight years ago in 2017.

Published on:

Could your child’s toothpaste be putting them at risk? That’s the question at the heart of a growing number of lawsuits against Hello Products, a company that markets itself as a “naturally friendly” oral care brand. While Hello toothpaste and mouthwash promise safe ingredients and kid-approved flavors, legal claims argue that some of their fluoride-containing products may be misleading consumers—especially parents who purchase them for young children.

What Is Hello Toothpaste?

Hello toothpaste is a brand that markets itself as a natural, eco-friendly alternative to traditional toothpaste. Founded with the goal of creating oral care products that are free from artificial sweeteners, dyes, and preservatives, Hello has gained popularity among consumers looking for fluoride-free and charcoal-infused options.

Published on:

Apple has agreed to pay $20 million to settle a defective watch class action lawsuit that alleged design defects in several Apple Watch models caused battery swelling, leading to costly damages. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claimed that Apple did not allocate enough internal space in certain models to accommodate battery expansion, a known and expected phenomenon in lithium-ion batteries.

As a result, plaintiffs alleged that when the battery swelled, it exerted pressure on the watch’s screen, causing the screen to detach, crack, or shatter entirely. Some users also reported injuries from broken glass when the screen popped off unexpectedly. The lawsuit further accused Apple of failing to properly disclose the risk of battery swelling and not covering the issue under its warranty policy. This was all resolved with a $20 million.  The good news? If you qualify, getting your settlement money will be easy. The bad news is that compensation payouts for victims, as we explain below, is not much.

Published on:

Hundreds of consumers have filed product liability lawsuits against pressure cooker manufacturers in recent years.

Pressure cookers have been a staple in kitchens for generations, providing a quick and convenient way to cook meals. However, in recent years, a number of lawsuits have been filed against pressure cooker manufacturers, alleging that their products are unsafe and can cause serious injuries.

The lawsuits allege that the pressure cookers had a design defect which caused the device to malfunction resulting in severe burns to the user. The following is what you need to know about defective pressure cooker lawsuits.  If you have been injured by a pressure cooker, you may be entitled to compensation.