Published on:

On this page, we will explain who might be eligible to file an Ozempic lawsuit. Our Ozempic lawyers will explain what qualifying criteria our firm is using to screen Ozempic injury cases and we will also discuss what the primary injuries are in the Ozempic lawsuits.

What Are the Ozempic Lawsuits About?

Ozempic is a prescription medication used to treat type 2 diabetes. Its active ingredient is semaglutide, which belongs to a class of drugs called glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. Ozempic is administered by injection and works by mimicking the effects of a natural hormone in the body that helps regulate blood sugar levels.

Published on:

On this page, we will explain who might be eligible to file a toxic baby autism lawsuit. We will explain what qualifying criteria our firm is using to screen baby food autism cases and we will also discuss what the potential settlement value of these cases might be.

About the Baby Food Lawsuits

The lawsuits alleging that toxic heavy metals in popular baby food products caused children to develop autism, originated out of an investigation report from a Congressional Subcommittee entitled Baby Foods are Tainted with Dangerous Levels of Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury (the “Congressional Report”). The Congressional Report publicly revealed that many of the most popular brands of baby food products were tested and found to contain very high levels of various heavy metals known to be toxic to humans.

Published on:

On this page we will explain who might be eligible to file an AFFF firefighting foam cancer lawsuit. We will explain what qualifying criteria our firm is using to screen AFFF cases and we will also discuss what the primary injuries are in the AFFF cases.

About the AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuits

AFFF stands for Aqueous Film-Forming Foam. It is a type of firefighting foam that is used to suppress flammable liquid fires, particularly those involving hydrocarbons. AFFF contains water, fluorochemical surfactants, and other additives. The foam works by forming a thin film on the surface of the flammable liquid, creating a barrier that separates the fuel from the air and suppresses the release of flammable vapors.

Published on:

On this page, our product liability lawyers explain who is potentially eligible to file a Paraquat lawsuit based on the current criteria that our firm is using to screen potential Paraquat cases. We will also discuss the potential settlement value of Paraquat lawsuits and what information Paraquat plaintiffs must provide in the class action MDL.

About the Paraquat Lawsuits

Paraquat is very strong industrial herbicide that is used in commercial farming across the U.S. Paraquat is actually illegal in most countries, but in the U.S. licensed farmers can buy it. Paraquat is manufactured by Syngenta, a global agro chemical company headquartered in Switzerland. In the U.S., Paraquat is usually sold under the brand name Gramoxone.

Published on:

On this page, we will look at who qualifies to file a Suboxone tooth decay lawsuit. We will summarize the basic eligibility criteria that our firm is applying to screen potential Suboxone lawsuits, and we will describe the relevant injuries associated with the Suboxone lawsuits.

About the Suboxone Lawsuits

Suboxone is a prescription drug that is commonly used for the treatment of opioid addiction recovery. There is overwhelming evidence showing that Suboxone causes chronic dry mouth which can lead to acute tooth decay and tooth loss. The manufacturers of Suboxone were aware of this side effect for more than a decade but failed to include any warning about tooth decay on the drug product label.

Published on:

On this page, we will explain who could be eligible to file a CPAP recall injury lawsuit in the Philips CPAP class action MDL. We will summarize the general eligibility criteria that our lawyers are currently using to screen these cases; and we will also provide a list of the relevant injuries associated with the recalled CPAP devices.

About the Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits

In June 2021, medical device company Philips issued a massive recall of nearly all of its Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) devices. The recall was initiated due to concerns about potential health risks associated with the use of foam used in the devices’ sound abatement foam. The foam may degrade over time, leading to the release of particles and gases that could be inhaled or ingested by the user.

Published on:

For several years, courts across the nation have been inundated with thousands of pending hernia mesh lawsuits. These product liability claims assert that hernia mesh implants from various manufacturers were defective, causing diverse complications post-surgery.

The lawsuits encompass multiple hernia mesh products produced by four medical device companies: Ethicon (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson that has recently settled most of its lawsuits), C.R. Bard (now part of Beckton Dickinson), Covidien, and Atrium Medical Corp. Lawsuits against each defendant have been consolidated into distinct class action MDLs.


UPDATES:

Published on:

Talcum powder products like baby powder were once used on a daily basis by millions of people in the U.S. It was recently discovered, however, that many talc products contained small amounts of asbestos which made them cancerous. Thousands of people who developed ovarian cancer or mesothelioma after extended use of talcum powder products are now suing the manufacturer, Johnson & Johnson, alleging that it knew about the dangers of talc and failed to warn them.

On this page we will look at the talcum powder cancer lawsuits and their potential settlement value.  If you have a potential talcum powder claim, call our talc cancer lawyers today.


UPDATES:

Published on:

We can all agree that NFL apparel is expensive.  A new lawsuit against the NFL claims that antitrust violations are a big part of the reason.

A class action lawsuit has been filed against the National Football League (NFL) and sports merchandise leader Fanatics in a Manhattan federal court. An Illinois resident accuses the NFL and its 32 teams of conspiring with Fanatics, based in Jacksonville, Florida, to monopolize the online retail market for licensed sports merchandise like jerseys and t-shirts. The suit claims this has led to consumers paying artificially high prices due to stifled competition.

The lawsuit alleges that instead of engaging in competitive sales, the NFL and its teams have effectively given Fanatics exclusive control over the market, with the sports merchandise company sharing its monopoly profits with the teams. This arrangement is said to have disadvantaged other retailers.

Published on:

Roundup lawsuit have been going on for over 8 years now. This is the story of the Roundup litigation, what plaintiffs can do in 2024, and an update on the latest spate of Roundup NHL verdicts nationwide.

Lawsuits regarding the Roundup weed killer allege that Monsanto’s herbicide led to the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma or similar cancers in individuals. Plaintiffs claim that Monsanto and its parent company, Bayer, failed to disclose the potential cancer risks associated with the product to the public. Moreover, these legal actions assert that the company deliberately misled the public about Roundup’s safety.

Referred to in litigation as the “Monsanto Papers,” internal communications from Monsanto revealed potential concealment of Roundup’s cancer connection over an extended period. These documents purportedly displayed evidence of the company’s amicable relationships with regulators and tactics employed to suppress scientific evidence linking glyphosate to cancer.