Published on:

In a significant legal development, Walgreens has agreed to a $100 million settlement to address allegations of overcharging insured customers for generic medications. The lawsuit contended that Walgreens did not factor in its Prescription Savings Club (PSC) prices when determining the “usual and customary” rates reported to insurers. This omission allegedly led to inflated costs for both consumers and third-party payors.

This Walgreens class action lawsuit settlement has been a long time in coming.  This lawsuit was filed eight years ago in 2017.

Published on:

Could your child’s toothpaste be putting them at risk? That’s the question at the heart of a growing number of lawsuits against Hello Products, a company that markets itself as a “naturally friendly” oral care brand. While Hello toothpaste and mouthwash promise safe ingredients and kid-approved flavors, legal claims argue that some of their fluoride-containing products may be misleading consumers—especially parents who purchase them for young children.

how to join, potential settlement amounts, and what comes next.

📚 Hello Toothpaste Lawsuit – Quick Navigation

Published on:

Apple has agreed to pay $20 million to settle a defective watch class action lawsuit that alleged design defects in several Apple Watch models caused battery swelling, leading to costly damages. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claimed that Apple did not allocate enough internal space in certain models to accommodate battery expansion, a known and expected phenomenon in lithium-ion batteries.

As a result, plaintiffs alleged that when the battery swelled, it exerted pressure on the watch’s screen, causing the screen to detach, crack, or shatter entirely. Some users also reported injuries from broken glass when the screen popped off unexpectedly. The lawsuit further accused Apple of failing to properly disclose the risk of battery swelling and not covering the issue under its warranty policy. This was all resolved with a $20 million.  The good news? If you qualify, getting your settlement money will be easy. The bad news is that compensation payouts for victims, as we explain below, is not much.

Published on:

Hundreds of consumers have filed product liability lawsuits against pressure cooker manufacturers in recent years.

Pressure cookers have been a staple in kitchens for generations, providing a quick and convenient way to cook meals. However, in recent years, a number of lawsuits have been filed against pressure cooker manufacturers, alleging that their products are unsafe and can cause serious injuries.

The lawsuits allege that the pressure cookers had a design defect which caused the device to malfunction resulting in severe burns to the user. The following is what you need to know about defective pressure cooker lawsuits.  If you have been injured by a pressure cooker, you may be entitled to compensation.

Published on:

Minecraft addiction lawsuits have emerged as a prominent legal issue in 2025, spotlighting the ethical concerns surrounding video game design and its impact on young players. With its unparalleled global popularity, Minecraft captivates millions by offering endless creative opportunities and open-world exploration.

These video game addiction lawsuits argue that Minecraft’s design exploits addictive tendencies through gameplay mechanics that encourage prolonged engagement, potentially leading to harmful consequences for children and families. These lawsuits allege Minecraft is addictive by design, raising questions about the dangers of Minecraft and the behavioral problems it may foster in vulnerable users. Allegations suggest that corporate profit motives have driven Mojang and Microsoft to prioritize engagement over player well-being, sparking debate over whether addictive elements in games should be better regulated.

Parents and researchers alike have observed troubling Minecraft addiction symptoms, such as excessive screen time, social withdrawal, and declining academic performance, which have fueled these legal actions.  Families and mental health professionals were asking the question of what makes Minecraft so addictive, exploring its gameplay mechanics and the psychological effects of its design. Studies show that the game’s lack of natural stopping points and reward-driven progression system can make it difficult for children to disengage, leading some to become truly addicted to Minecraft. As we explain below, we now know: it was done on purpose by clever designers focused on profits and not children.

Published on:

This page provides a comprehensive guide to the legal landscape surrounding Filshie Clip lawsuits, offering detailed information about the risks, allegations, and potential outcomes for those affected. These lawsuits focus on complications caused by tubal ligation clips, such as migration, organ damage, and chronic pain, which often require surgical intervention.

Plaintiffs allege that manufacturers failed to adequately warn patients and healthcare providers about these risks, leading to severe physical, emotional, and financial harm. If you’ve ever wondered, “Has anyone won a Filshie Clip lawsuit?” or are curious about the likelihood of compensation, our delve into what plaintiffs might expect if these claims are successful, including projected Filshie Clip lawsuit payouts based on similar medical device cases.
Continue Reading

Published on:

Eliquis, also known by its generic name apixaban, is an anticoagulant medication prescribed to reduce the risk of stroke and blood clots in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, as well as to treat and prevent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).

This post talks about Eliquis side effects. Every drug has them.  But Eliquis has proven to be generally safe and effective.

Our law firm is not involved in any Eliquis lawsuits, and our attorneys do not believe there are viable product liability causes of action with respect to Eliquis’s side effects. But we talk about the legal issues that have risen with Eliquis and the type of Eliquis-related lawsuits our firm does review.

Published on:

Some plaintiffs’ lawyers are looking at the question of whether prednisone causes cancer.  Our law firm is not taking prednisone cancer lawsuits, at least not yet.  But we are following the medical literature to see if there are viable lawsuits here.

As lawyers, our role often requires us to evaluate scientific evidence to determine whether it supports viable claims for litigation. Again, this has led to our interest in the relationship between long-term use of prednisone and cancer.

Prednisone

Published on:

This page will look at who qualifies to file a Paragard IUD injury lawsuit. We will summarize the basic eligibility criteria that our firm is applying to screen potential Paragard lawsuits and describe the relevant injuries associated with these cases. We will also look at the possible settlement payouts for Paragard claims.

About the Paragard Lawsuits

The Paragard, an intrauterine device (IUD) manufactured by Teva Pharmaceuticals, has served as a long-term contraceptive method for women since the late 1980s. Despite its high efficacy in birth control, the Paragard IUD has faced various issues. It has a significant design flaw that frequently leads to the device fracturing within a woman’s body during attempted removal.

Published on:

Between 1957 and 1987, the water supply at Camp Lejeune, a Marine Corps base in North Carolina, was contaminated with harmful chemicals at exceedingly high levels. Studies have demonstrated that exposure to this contaminated water while residing or working at Camp Lejeune led to the development of cancer, birth defects, and various health issues for numerous individuals. Unfortunately, North Carolina law has prevented these Camp Lejeune victims from pursuing legal action. However, the U.S. Senate is on the verge of passing a new federal law that will allow victims of water contamination at Camp Lejeune to file claims and receive financial compensation.

Where Camp Lejeune Lawsuits Are Going in 2025

We are moving pretty slowly. There are nearly 500,000 claims (many of which are not viable). Almost all these claims are still in the administrative phase with the JAG, where claimants are required to submit evidence of exposure and a connection between their health conditions and the contaminated water. Due to the overwhelming volume of claims coupled with government bureaucracy, this process has created a bottleneck, delaying progress.